{"id":274,"date":"2005-03-22T08:24:00","date_gmt":"2005-03-22T08:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/Miscellany\/trekmovies.html"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T04:00:00","slug":"trekmovies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/2005\/03\/22\/trekmovies\/","title":{"rendered":"A Brief History of Star Trek Movies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let me start by saying I&#8217;m a fan of the Star Trek franchise.  I probably don&#8217;t qualify as a Trekkie, but I&#8217;ve watched large chunks of all of the various series, and I have seen all of the movies.  Upon reading recently of the upcoming <a href=\"http:\/\/www.darkhorizons.com\/news05\/050310b.php\">11th Star Trek Movie<\/a>, I was reminded of the Curse of the Odd, and wondered what portents it might hold.<\/p>\n<p>The Curse of the Odd is my theory that every odd-numbered Star Trek movie sucks (to varying degrees of suck), and that every even-numbered Trek film is worth seeing.  Before you agree or disagree, I&#8217;ll admit that there is an exception- but whether it&#8217;s the exception that proves the rule or a sign that the theory is flawed remains an open question.  So, let&#8217;s review:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0079945\/\">Star Trek: On Ice!<\/a> &#8211; Featuring a stark, lifeless bridge as cold as a Klingon prison planet and the worst Star Trek villian ever.  Sputnik <em>so<\/em> would have nailed that role.  Odd=Bad.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0084726\/\">Star Trek II: Khan!<\/a> (Read aloud, the way Kirk screams into the communicator at his nemesis) &#8211; Brain worms and rich, corinthian leather.  What&#8217;s not to love?  Argued by many to be the best of the bunch.  Even = Good.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0088170\/\">Star Trek III: Where&#8217;s Spocko?<\/a> &#8211; Spock&#8217;s big screen directorial debut.  Perhaps the best of the worst, but just not a standout.  Even though it had Klingons and Spock&#8217;s daddy, it just didn&#8217;t do much for me.   Odd = Bad.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0092007\/\">Star Trek IV: The Whale Movie<\/a> &#8211; My personal favorite of the original cast films.  Cheesey, yes, but good, clean, honest cheese.  This film has some of my favorite movie soundbites (Kirk: &#8220;Double dumbass on you!&#8221;; Scotty: &#8220;Hell-ooo computer!&#8221;; Spock: &#8220;They are not the hell your whales&#8221;) and some of the silliest Trek moments of all time (Sulu flew a &#8220;Huey&#8221; during his Academy days?).  This movie is just plain fun.  Spock&#8217;s second turn directing.  Even = Good.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0098382\/\">Star Trek V: Are You There, God?  It&#8217;s Me, Sybek<\/a> &#8211; or, why <a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/name\/nm0000638\/\">Denny Crane<\/a> should never, ever direct a Trek movie. There are no words.  Odd = Bad.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0102975\/\">Star Trek VI: Those Klingon Bastards!<\/a> (again, with Shatner-esque feeling!) &#8211; &#8220;I&#8217;ll never forgive them&#8230; for the death of my boy!&#8221;  Kirk may hold a grudge, but everyone else loves those wacky Klingons.  Why can&#8217;t we all just get along?  Even = Good.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0111280\/\">Star Trek: I&#8217;m Not Dead Yet!<\/a> &#8211; The death scene he waited his whole life to portray as Shatner returns for his final hurrah, passing the torch the the next, um, generation.  Or, to paraphrase Malcom Macdowell&#8217;s character, &#8220;Time is the fire in which I wasted two hours on this film.&#8221;  Thumbs up to the crash scene effects, if not the whole stupid notion.  Odd = Bad.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0117731\/\">Star Trek: Back to the Future<\/a> &#8211; Time travel worked for The Whale Movie, and it works again here.  For my money, best treatment of the Borg yet.  The Queen\/Data scenes lacked a bit, but overall a good flick.  My favorite of the NextGen era.  Riker&#8217;s big screen directorial debut.  Even = Good.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0120844\/\">Star Trek: The Joysick Movie<\/a> &#8211; Nothing sums up this piece of crap like the sight of a $30 wingman joystick rising out of the center of the floor of the bridge of the <em>Enterprise<\/em> on a pedestal so Riker can fly a mile-long starship one-handed.  And let&#8217;s not even talk about Worf&#8217;s pimple.  Riker&#8217;s second (and last!) Trek movie directing stint.  Odd = Bad.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/imdb.com\/title\/tt0253754\/\">Star Trek: Bald is Beautiful&#8230; Unless You&#8217;re a Romulan<\/a> &#8211; and here we come to the flaw in my perfect little gem of a Theory.  This was supposed to be a good Trek film!  Ten is an even number, I tell you!  Alas, not even the power of Mathematics could save this beast.  A Romulan Picard clone?  Someone should have initiated the self-destruct sequence long before that script started shooting.  Combined with the dissapointment (Even!!), this is my vote for worst Trek film ever.  Even=A Major Letdown.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>So there you have it.  What will #11 bring, besides a new cast?  Will the Curse of the Odd hold out, or did #10 suck so bad as to warp the fabric of the Trek movie continuum, resetting the Curse?  Only time will tell.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let me start by saying I&#8217;m a fan of the Star Trek franchise. I probably don&#8217;t qualify as a Trekkie, but I&#8217;ve watched large chunks of all of the various series, and I have seen all of the movies. Upon reading recently of the upcoming 11th Star Trek Movie, I was reminded of the Curse [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellany"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jclark.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}