Parallax Boe-Bot

As I kid, I was fascinated by electronics. I had one of those “150-in-1” electronics projects kits from Radio Shack, the kind with the springs that you bent to insert wires to connect the components mounted in the kit. I had a well worn copy of Forrest R. Mimms’ Getting Started in Electronics, as well as a number of his “Engineer’s Mini-Notebooks”, which were also sold at Radio Shack, alongside the overpriced component displays. I spent a good deal of my allowance (and later, paper route earnings) on blister packs of resistors, capacitors, and ICs, and soldered together many projects, with varying degrees of success.

Over the past couple of years, this interest has been renewed as I’ve been reading up on microcontrollers and hobby robotics. Bill Bumgarner’s recent posts about experimenting with AVR microcontrollers and the EMSL AtmegaXX8 Target Board have inspired me to make some time to tinker. While I have done some experimenting with AVRs using the 20.00 USD Atmel Butterfly recently, I decided to haul out the Parallax Boe-Bot I purchased a couple of years ago, and never got around to playing with.

I bought the Boe-Bot because I caught a great deal from Micro Center. Parallax sells the Boe-Bot for 159.95 USD, and you can often find them for sale for about 20 bucks less. I picked mine up for 49.00 USD, which is the Parallax list price for just the BASIC Stamp BS2 Microcontroller included with the kit. The kit also includes 2 Parallax Continuous Rotation Servos, which are actually Futaba S148 Standard Precision Servos which have already been modified for continuous rotation. Parallax sells them for 12.95 USD a piece, which is a good price on these servos, and an even better deal as they are already modified.

In spite of the good deal, I did have some reservations. As a matter of personal preference (and perhaps, programmer’s ego), I would prefer to program the microcontroller directly in C. I believe this provides the most flexibility on limited hardware, as well as the greatest opportunity for learning as I go. This is the primary reason why I avoided the open-source, AVR-based Arduino platform popularized by Make Magazine– the Arduino is programmed in a custom programming language. (Update: In the comments, David A. Mellis explains that the Arduino is programmed in C/C++, and that the Arduino language is a set of helper functions. I sense a purchase in the offing!) The BASIC Stamp 2 used in the Boe-Bot is programmed using Parallax’s custom variant of BASIC called PBASIC. While there are BASIC Stamp clones available from other manufacturers that are programmed with PBASIC variants, much of the details of programming in PBASIC is not directly translatable to the kinds of chips I am interested in, such as the AVR.

Another concern about the Stamp is licensing. While looking for information on programming the Stamp via Linux (Parallax only supplies Windows software), I found the following commentary in a reply to a question on the Ubuntu Forums about using the BStamp tools for Linux (more on this in an upcoming post.):

The package is apparently using two licenses, GNU for the volunteered portion, and PBASIC license. PBASIC Tokenizer Library software is used with hardware that is sold by Parallax. The license to redistribute any programs written is very restrictive, including requiring a driver’s license, and written agreement in the possession of Parallax, and subject to revokations including those mentioned within that package. The source for the library is not provided, and the library file is stripped. It is only useful with their hardware.

When working on personal projects, I prefer to use open source software whenever possible, to allow for the greatest flexibility should I wish to change the software or redistribute my work, but I do not object to closed-sourced software on moral grounds; open source is simply a better value for me. In the case of the BASIC Stamp, I intend to use the Boe-Bot kit as an inexpensive way to experiment with small scale robotics for my own enjoyment. At 49.95 USD, the pros outweigh the cons. If I decide to move on to custom designed projects, I will likely use an AVR or other inexpensive, more programmable microcontroller.

The Parallax line is not without its benefits as well. Parallax positions their products not only as hobbyist devices, but also as educational aides. The Boe-Bot kit includes a 340+ page spiral bound manual that explains much more than just construction (which only takes about 15 minutes). There are chapters on servo motors and how they work, robot navigation using dead reckoning, tactile navigation using physical touch sensors (implemented via metal “whiskers”, and non-tactile navigation using both visible light detection and infrared obstacle sensing. The text assumes little knowledge, and explains both the principle and implementation of these features. Most of the information learned from this course is directly applicable to other robotics projects, even if the PBASIC used to implement behaviors is not. If my son ever expresses an interest in microcontrollers or robotics, I will definitely start him with a Parallax kit.

While Parallax may exert strict control over the code to parse and compile PBASIC, they are far more open with their instructional texts. Their Stamps in Class line of kits (which includes the Boe-Bot) includes 9 distint products, which can be used in several progressions. All of the kits are built around the BASIC Stamp and the user’s choice of controller boards. Their are two controllers, the flagship Board of Education and the less expensive HomeWork Board (sold in 10 packs for schools). The starter kits- the Boe-Bot and “What is a Micrcontroller“- include a Board of Education; the other kits act as add-ons, combining a thorough text with additional parts needed to complete the projects and experiments in the books. Best of all, the books are not only available for sale separately, but they are all also available as free PDF downloads from the Parallax website. I’ve browsed several, and the quality appears as good as the Boe-Bot manual. This was a big part of my decision to grab the Boe-Bot when I saw it on sale. The book included with the industrial control kit includes a very good chapter on PID, or Proportional-Integral-Derivative control. This system is used not only in many industrial control scenarios, but also in two-wheeled self-balancing robots such as Larry Borello’s Gyrobot. (Note: After I started writing this post, I learned that the Industrial Control kit is discontinued. I do not know if it will be replaced with an updated version, but the latest manual is still available for download).

I have just begun to play around with the kit, and in truth, I am skimming some of the early material as I already have a firm grasp on the fundamentals of programming. I am also familiar with the basics of small robot design from other reading I have done. I can’t provide a full review as I have not worked my way through all of the material yet. I can say that I it is a well thought-out product and appears to provide a lot of learning opportunity for the beginning roboticist. I will post again in the near future with details on using the Boe-Bot (or other BASIC Stamp product) with Linux, and possibly on more on my experiences with the kit itself.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “Parallax Boe-Bot”

  1. David A. Mellis Says:

    Actually, Arduino is programmed in standard C/C++ as explained in the FAQ:

    There’s some minimal pre-processing done to your code (the automatic creation of prototype declarations for the functions in your main file) and then it’s passed directly to gcc (avr-g++). More details are available at:

    Arduino provides a standard set of libraries with a straightforward API, but you are free to ignore them and write standard AVR C code.

  2. Jason Says:


    Thank you very much for correcting me and pointing me in the right direction. I really can’t believe I hadn’t read that before. I’ve added an update to the post, and I’ll be doing some reading on the Arduino site tonight. I want to read through the build process and optional bootloader info and get a better understanding of the system.

    I think I see a shiny new Arduino in my future.

    Thanks, Jason

  3. Mr. Hobby Says:

    Thanks, for the info on the BOE BOT, We have one at house as well as lynxmotion hex pod walker. Jut looking for options on things you can do other thn the basic line following stuff, maybe a self chargering etc.